top of page

Are Labs Within a Nurse’s Scope of Practice? Let’s Reframe the Conversation

When I first started teaching functional medicine to nurses years ago, I was incredibly cautious when it came to lab work.


My recommendation back then? Focus on the intake. Patient-reported symptoms. Existing lab results, if available. And then—encourage the patient to request updated and expanded labs from their primary care provider. It felt like the safest route. After all, scope of practice is no small thing. We must protect our licensure, our training, and keep our responsibility to the patients we serve top of mind at all times.


But over time, I realized something important: this overly cautious approach wasn’t just limiting—it was leaving patients without guidance in a system that often wasn’t listening to them. And it was making nurses feel like their clinical judgment didn’t count.


So, let’s talk about it. Let’s explore where lab work fits into the nursing scope of practice for both RNs and NPs—and why now, more than ever, nurses need to rethink their relationship with lab data.


Why Nurses Hesitate to Use Labs (And Why That Needs to Change)


For nurse practitioners, one barrier is often invisible to those outside the system: insurance credentialing.


When you’re a credentialed provider with insurance, you’re expected to order only those labs you are trained to interpret—and equipped to build a plan of care around. If a patient requested a full thyroid panel early in my NP career, I was hesitant. I said "No." Why? Because I had been trained to manage thyroid disorders using TSH (maybe T4), and anything beyond that felt like stepping into unfamiliar territory. It wasn't part of the guidelines I was trained to follow. And ordering a lab you can’t justify or explain? That’s risky—both legally and ethically.


But the reality is: patients are getting these labs anyway.


ree

The direct-to-consumer lab market has exploded. Patients are ordering their own comprehensive hormone panels, food sensitivity tests, micronutrient profiles—you name it. They’re walking into our offices, inboxes, and messages with results in hand and no idea what to do next.


So, here’s the truth we have to face:



Patients are accessing lab work with or without us. The question is—are we prepared to help them make sense of it safely?


What’s Within RN and NP Scope When It Comes to Labs?


Let’s break it down:


For RNs:


Registered Nurses absolutely work with lab results every day. If you’ve ever:

  • Interpreted electrolyte values to follow a potassium replacement protocol

  • Educated a patient on why they’re getting a magnesium infusion

  • Notified a provider of abnormal labs

  • Taught a patient with type 2 diabetes how their A1c reflects long-term blood sugar trends


…you’re already working with labs.


Nurses are trained to recognize, report, monitor, and educate. While RNs don’t typically order labs independently (unless under protocol or within a standing order), they can review lab results with patients and offer lifestyle education based on evidence and scope-aligned practices.


Example: A cardiac nurse sees that a patient’s increased Lasix dose has dropped their potassium. They advocate for replacement, follow a protocol, and educate the patient on the role of potassium. This is clinical judgment in action—and it’s exactly what we need to expand into the functional medicine space.


For NPs:


Nurse Practitioners, depending on their license and setting, often have full authority to order and interpret labs. However, there are some nuances to understand:


  • Billing and insurance (as I mentioned above)

  • Familiarity with functional vs conventional labs

  • Responsibility for critical lab values


And this last one matters a lot.


Let’s say you order a functional lab panel and CMP, and it returns a potassium level of 6.0 or a glucose over 400. You now carry legal responsibility for urgent follow-up—and if you’re not trained in that interpretation or working within a team that supports you, that can quickly become dangerous or overwhelming.


And this is an excellent example of why labs have been ordered through prescribing providers like MDs and NPs with advanced training in handling these critical lab values. But that is changing! Patients are getting these results from direct-to-consumer lab companies online, and they are using "Dr. Google" to treat themselves- often with potentially harmful interventions.


Why the Resistance from Other Providers?


Early in my journey teaching functional medicine to RNs and NPs, I encouraged nurses to send patients back to their PCPs to request additional labs. "Write a letter listing what you're hoping for and how you help their patients." It seemed collaborative. But what I saw over and over again was this:


Resistance.


Many primary care providers aren’t trained in functional lab interpretation. They may not see the need for a full thyroid panel, nutrient markers, or GI health testing. Worse, some see these requests as undermining their authority or "Dr. Google" inspired.


This created a dead end—leaving nurses and patients frustrated and unsupported.

That was the moment I knew we had to do more than defer. We need to educate nurses on how to understand labs within their scope—and how to partner with the right systems to support them when something is outside it.


Reframing How Nurses Use Labs


It’s time for a mindset shift.


Functional labs aren’t just for MDs. Nurses already have the skills—they just need the language and structure to confidently apply it in their own scope.

ree

Here’s what that can look like:


  • Using labs to inform education and coaching RNs can use existing lab work to guide lifestyle, nutrition, and wellness conversations. Teaching patients how blood sugar patterns reflect dietary choices, or explaining how inflammation markers may be tied to lifestyle habits, is fully within nursing practice.

  • Learning through real-life data Many nurses order labs for themselves, loved ones, or practice clients, and then schedule interpretation sessions with lab companies. These experiences are invaluable for learning. But here’s the catch: not all companies allow RNs to schedule interpretation calls—something to be aware of when choosing lab partners.

  • Recognizing when to refer and collaborate Understanding critical values and knowing when a provider needs to step in is a key piece of safe nursing practice. But that doesn’t mean stepping back from labs—it means knowing your role, and finding collaborative systems that support you and your patients.


The Two Biggest Challenges Nurses Face with Labs


If we want nurses to fully embrace the use of lab data in functional practice, we need to acknowledge two major barriers:


1. The Accountability Factor


It’s not enough to just “order labs.” Whoever orders them must take full responsibility for critical values and urgent follow-up. That’s not a bureaucratic burden—it’s a patient safety issue. Nurses must work within frameworks that support this legal and ethical requirement.


2. Limited Access to Lab Interpretation Support


Many functional lab companies allow NPs and MDs to schedule case reviews or interpretation calls—but exclude RNs. Some of them even allow health coaches to schedule, but not RNs (I'm rolling my eyes). This creates a major learning gap and makes it harder for RNs to build confidence with labs.


It’s something I’ve seen over and over: RNs can technically order some functional labs, but then they’re locked out of the tools that help make sense of them. And that’s not okay.


I teach RNs and NPs they need to be very well educated on any tools or interventions they will be using in their practice, so its important to be well versed and supported in any labs nursing professional might choose to incorporate into their practice. Plus- once again- our patients are getting these labs online from direct-to-consumer lab companies, but then nurses are excluded from support in understanding how the results apply to their unique patient. And their PCP probably has NO CLUE what these functional labs are or how to support them, so back to "Dr. Google" our patients are going.


So What’s the Solution?


That’s exactly what I’ll cover in my next article. I have some meetings, research, and ideas brewing, and I'll be sharing more in my next article.


In the Meantime…


If this conversation resonates with you, I invite you to read or revisit my earlier blog: “Understanding Laboratory Reference Ranges: A Functional Medicine Perspective”. It lays the foundation for this conversation and helps you think differently about what "normal" lab values actually mean.


Nurses, Let’s Reclaim Our Role


You already have the knowledge. You already understand labs more deeply than you realize. The next step is embracing that power—and finding the tools and support that help you practice safely, ethically, and within your full scope.


Functional nursing isn’t about going rogue. It’s about going deep. And nurses are already trained to do just that. If you're looking for education and support in using standard and functional labs in your practice, consider joining us at the Institute for Functional Nursing. We have our upcoming Functional Nursing Program launching soon, and we already have a thriving Functional Nursing Membership full of RNs and NPs seeking support and connection for their practice.


Let’s stop asking if labs are “allowed” in nursing. Let’s start asking how we can use them responsibly, ethically, and effectively to guide whole-person care. Let's change healthcare!

 
 

Learn More

Curious about how to take your knowledge further? Whether you're new to functional nursing or ready to deepen your skills, I've created several courses designed specifically for nurses who want to lead, educate, and practice differently. Explore the options below to keep learning and growing in your own unique direction.

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Spotify
  • Apple Music
bottom of page